LPS MENTAL HEALTH CONSERVATORSHIP
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIPS FOR THE GRAVELY DISABLED
    • LPS Conservatorship Court Overview >
      • Public Conservator >
        • Los Angeles Public Guardian
        • CONSERVATORSHIP INVESTIGATION REPORT
        • CAREER >
          • Continuing Education
          • Public Conservator County Numbers '16
          • San Diego Public Conservator '19
        • LPS Conservatorship for Dependent Parents and Minors
      • WHY ARE LPS CONSERVATORSHIP AND PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIPS DIFFERENT
      • Court of Appeals >
        • In re Ben C- Wende Brief no issue writ
      • Trial Court Transcript
      • Conservatorship Legal Documents
      • INITIAL INVOLUNTARY PROCEEDINGS >
        • Grave Disability >
          • Present Grave Disability
        • Venue
        • Conservator's Bond
        • When the Conservatee Goes AWOL
        • Involuntary Commitment
        • Conservatorship Factors
        • Riese Hearing >
          • Riese Hearing
        • Supplemental Security Income/ SSI >
          • Applying for SSI
          • Documents for SSI
          • Process and Appeal
          • Award Letter
          • Rep Payee
          • SSI Amounts 2018/2019
  • LPS Conservatorship Case Law
    • THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
    • Conservatorship of Isaac O- court report omission and jurisdiction
    • Disparate Treatment- Conservatorship of E.B
    • Conservatorship of KW- hearsay and jury instructions
    • Peremptory Challenges and Conservatorship of Gordon
    • Conservatorship of Sorenson privacy rights and LPS matters
    • Imposition of special disabilities- Conservatorship of Walker
    • Continuing Jurisdiction/Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of McKeown
    • Hearsay and conservatorship of Manton
    • Conservatorship of the Person of S.A.
    • Writ of Habeas Corpus burden of proof
    • Conservatorship of Roulet- burden of proof
    • Special disabilities and due process- Conservatorship of K.G and Donna H.
    • Conservatorship of Davis and Third party assistance
    • Marsden hearings/ due process Conservatorship of David
    • Conservatorship of Torres and admissibility
    • Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of Law
    • Conservatorship of George H- jury instruction
    • Public Conservator's Exclusive Power to Initiate LPS Conservatorship Kaplan v. Superior Court
    • Constitutionality of LPS conservatorship- Conservatorship of Delay
    • Investigation report- Conservatorship of Ivey
    • Conservatorship of Jesse G
    • Grave Disability Standard and Jury trial notice Conservatorship of Benvenuto
    • Conservatorship of Kennebrew vs Conservatorship of Karriker
    • Jury Trial Delays - Conservatorship of Joanne R.
    • Conservatorship of Hofferber- criminal incompetence and LPS
    • "Discretionary abuse" Conservatorship of G.H.
    • In re Elizabeth R- LPS Conserved Parent with a concurrent dependency case
    • Conservatorship of C.O. - Waiver of Jury Trial
    • Conservatorship of Smith and strange behaviour
    • Jury Trials- ​Conservatorship of Jose B
    • Conservatorship of Baber and Double jeopardy and third party evidence >
      • WIP- Conservatorship of Tedesco
      • Conservatorship of Symington (1989)
      • Effective Counsel
      • Faretta and Marsden
      • Exceptions: Third Party Evidence
      • Exclusionary Rule WIP
      • Fifth Amendment Rights
  • LIFETIME PROHIBITOR WELF & INST CODE § 8103 SUBD. (F)(1)(B) 18 U.S.C. § 922 (G) (4)
    • CA MHRS >
      • Armed and Prohibited Person System
    • National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS)
    • Registration
  • For LPS Conservatees
    • RIGHT TO APPEAR IN COURT
    • JUDICIAL REVIEW >
      • WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    • NOTICE
    • MEDICATION
    • PLAN OF CARE IF DISCHARGED
    • RIGHT TO COUNSEL
  • BUILDING A STRONG CASE FOR CONSERVATORSHIP
    • POWERS OF CONSERVATOR >
      • Placement Powers
      • Medication powers
    • WHY ONLY THE PUBLIC CONSERVATOR IS ALLOWED TO FILE FOR LPS CONSERVATORSHIP
    • SERVING AS CONSERVATOR
    • DSM V DIAGNOSIS LIMITS
    • CONSERVATEE INTERVIEW
    • HISTORY OF DECOMPENSATION AND LACK OF INSIGHT
    • WRAPPING IT ALL TOGETHER AND CREATING THE NEXUS BETWEEN SYMPTOMS, HISTORY, COMPLIANCE, THIRD PARTY ASSISTANCE TO PROOF OF CURRENT GRAVE DISABILITY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
  • JUVENILE DEPENDENCY
    • FAST TRACK DEPENDENCY
    • DEPENDENCY APPEALS
    • DETENTION
    • JURISDICTION DISPOSITION (JURIS/DISPO)
    • §366.26 Hearing: Selection and Implementation
    • 730 Evaluators
    • Case Plan
  • New Updates
    • Right to Choose
Picture

 
Understanding the LPS Conservatorship Court

Picture


The court procedure for conservatorship is similar to a criminal proceeding. It is strongly advised that the conservatee attend the LPS conservatorship hearing. The conservatee is usually represented by a public defender or private counsel but often they cannot afford to do so. The conservatee will appear in court after the T-con for 30 days. On the day of the hearing, the doctor, counsel for conservatee, conservatee, public conservator, and counsel for PC will all attend the hearing. The judge will preside over the hearing. Most of the time for P- con hearings only the judge will be present. There will not be any jury for this hearing. This is known as a bench hearing. If the conservatee wishes, they can have what is known as a jury trial. A jury trial can be set if the conservatee objects and wishes that a jury hears the matter, the judge can set a date for a trial. If the matter is taken to trial, the conservatee will have the burden of proof to show that they are not gravely disabled.

On the day of the hearing, the conservatee usually is transported to the courthouse in a gurney by the hospital. This prevents the conservatee from escaping which has happened. The conservatee will be usually in restraints out of concern of going AWOL. It is written in the law that the conservatee has the option to waive their right to appear in court. Sometimes the conservatee's counsel may waive their presence out of concern over concern for the conservatee's mental health. Many times in practice the conservatee will not be present because the lack the mental clarity to voice an opinion. Then the public conservator representative, counsel for the county, conservatee's counsel, judge, and doctor may appear. 

To begin the judge may or may not swear in all parties. Sometimes this does not occur but most of the time it does. During the hearing, the doctor will present his findings first. He will cite behaviour during the hospitalization. If needed, he may draw from other treatment periods if he was the treating psychiatrist. The doctor will be cross examined by the conservatee's counsel. Typically counsel will ask the doctor how long he has been practicing, how many times he has treated the conservatee, what medications, and what the diagnosis is. If need be the doctor may also answer questions such as do certain symptoms disable the conservatee and how. Does the conservatee meet the criteria for grave disability and how are they rendered unable to provide their basic needs. Next the conservatee will be given an opportunity to present their own testimony. The conservatee can make statements about how they will provide for their food, clothing, and shelter. Often what they say will be along the lines of I will live in a shelter after discharge. I can get food from a food bank or a friend. The conservatee may also be cross examined and asked if they believe if they have a mental illness, how many times they have been hospitalized, and will they take their meds after discharge. The conservatee can provide their answers regardless of what their real intents are. After all of the evidence is presented, the judge will make a common sense ruling. If the case involves the Pubic conservator, the judge will tend to rule in favour of the PC's recommendations. 

The hearings are quite short. They run from 10-25 minutes. Once the hearing has completed, the conservatee will be transported to the facility regardless of decision. If the judge ruled in favour of conservatorship, letters will be issued within a week. If not the conservatee will be discharged within a day.

​

Who will be present at the hearing

  • Patient's counsel
  • The Treating Physician
  • County Counsel
  • LPS Court Investigator 
  • The Conservatee
<
>
An attorney appointed by the state bar of California will be appointed to represent the patient at the P-con hearing. At this hearing counsel will review the court system with the patient and the reasons why the public conservator/doctor has brought this case to court. Counsel may review the court investigation report which is a document reviewing the reasons that brought the patient to the hospital and the necessity for LPS conservatorship.

The most important thing is that patient's counsel will be with them throughout the entire process. T
here are multiple hearings in this process and patient's counsel will be there to help them at each one.


Conservatees have a legal right to court appointed counsel under WIC 5365. 

Due to the high demands of the court system, conservatees will meet with their counsel for only 10- 20 minutes before their hearing. They may also phone their counsel but often it takes a while for email and phone calls to receive a response. Conservatees can sometimes represent themselves but it is a rare exception and inadvisable.


"counsel must be appointed within 5 days after the filing of a petition for appointment of a conservator" Welf & I C §5365.
The treating doctor will generally appear at the conservatorship hearing. They will be cross examined by patient's counsel and county counsel about their opinion on the patient's grave disability. They are responsible for filing the recommendation for LPS conservatorship to the conservator's office. If certain circumstances if the doctor fails to appear, then the conservatorship will be terminated.
County counsel will represent the office of the public conservator/guardian. They will cross examine the doctor and the patient. They have a large case load so they tend to not know the specifics of each case. County counsel represents many cases in one day. There are believed to be two in San Diego county. County Counsel for LPS hearings represent mental health matters. If there are pending criminal charges or probate issues county counsel will not be represent the public guardian at those hearings.


The court investigator is a employee of the county. There is a LPS deputy worker assigned each court day to be present at the court hearing. They will be presenting the cases even though they may have not been the one to write the court investigation report. However, they will have a general understanding of the court investigation report and present it to the court and be able to answer questions based off the facts within.
The patient has the right to be present at the hearing. They also maintain the right to not be present. They can discuss that option with their counsel. They will be given a chance to testify about their own opinion about the need for conservatorship and mental health history. The facility generally has the obligation to transport the patient to the courthouse on the day of their hearing.

More Court FAQ's

What is Grave Disability?
Certification Review hearings
What if a Conservatee goes missing (elopes)?
Do I need a Conservatorship Bond
What is Third party assistance?

    Questions or need more information?

    Leave phone or email for contact/ check spam folder for response
Enter

Los Angeles Office of the Public Guardian 
510 S Vermont Ave, 14th Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90020 
Phone: LPS (213) 974-0527
(213) 974- 0407
Los Angeles Mental Health Court 
5925 Hollywood Blvd 
Los Angeles, California 90028 
Fax: (442) 247-3972


San Diego Central Courthouse
1100 Union St, Dept 1902
​LPS Hearings Tuesday/Thursday 9am
San Diego, California 92101 
Phone: (619) 844-2700



San Diego
Office of the Public Conservator

5560 Overland Ave Ste 130
San Diego, California 92123
Phone: (858) 694-3500 ext 2
© 2017 LPS Conserved   ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIPS FOR THE GRAVELY DISABLED
    • LPS Conservatorship Court Overview >
      • Public Conservator >
        • Los Angeles Public Guardian
        • CONSERVATORSHIP INVESTIGATION REPORT
        • CAREER >
          • Continuing Education
          • Public Conservator County Numbers '16
          • San Diego Public Conservator '19
        • LPS Conservatorship for Dependent Parents and Minors
      • WHY ARE LPS CONSERVATORSHIP AND PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIPS DIFFERENT
      • Court of Appeals >
        • In re Ben C- Wende Brief no issue writ
      • Trial Court Transcript
      • Conservatorship Legal Documents
      • INITIAL INVOLUNTARY PROCEEDINGS >
        • Grave Disability >
          • Present Grave Disability
        • Venue
        • Conservator's Bond
        • When the Conservatee Goes AWOL
        • Involuntary Commitment
        • Conservatorship Factors
        • Riese Hearing >
          • Riese Hearing
        • Supplemental Security Income/ SSI >
          • Applying for SSI
          • Documents for SSI
          • Process and Appeal
          • Award Letter
          • Rep Payee
          • SSI Amounts 2018/2019
  • LPS Conservatorship Case Law
    • THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
    • Conservatorship of Isaac O- court report omission and jurisdiction
    • Disparate Treatment- Conservatorship of E.B
    • Conservatorship of KW- hearsay and jury instructions
    • Peremptory Challenges and Conservatorship of Gordon
    • Conservatorship of Sorenson privacy rights and LPS matters
    • Imposition of special disabilities- Conservatorship of Walker
    • Continuing Jurisdiction/Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of McKeown
    • Hearsay and conservatorship of Manton
    • Conservatorship of the Person of S.A.
    • Writ of Habeas Corpus burden of proof
    • Conservatorship of Roulet- burden of proof
    • Special disabilities and due process- Conservatorship of K.G and Donna H.
    • Conservatorship of Davis and Third party assistance
    • Marsden hearings/ due process Conservatorship of David
    • Conservatorship of Torres and admissibility
    • Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of Law
    • Conservatorship of George H- jury instruction
    • Public Conservator's Exclusive Power to Initiate LPS Conservatorship Kaplan v. Superior Court
    • Constitutionality of LPS conservatorship- Conservatorship of Delay
    • Investigation report- Conservatorship of Ivey
    • Conservatorship of Jesse G
    • Grave Disability Standard and Jury trial notice Conservatorship of Benvenuto
    • Conservatorship of Kennebrew vs Conservatorship of Karriker
    • Jury Trial Delays - Conservatorship of Joanne R.
    • Conservatorship of Hofferber- criminal incompetence and LPS
    • "Discretionary abuse" Conservatorship of G.H.
    • In re Elizabeth R- LPS Conserved Parent with a concurrent dependency case
    • Conservatorship of C.O. - Waiver of Jury Trial
    • Conservatorship of Smith and strange behaviour
    • Jury Trials- ​Conservatorship of Jose B
    • Conservatorship of Baber and Double jeopardy and third party evidence >
      • WIP- Conservatorship of Tedesco
      • Conservatorship of Symington (1989)
      • Effective Counsel
      • Faretta and Marsden
      • Exceptions: Third Party Evidence
      • Exclusionary Rule WIP
      • Fifth Amendment Rights
  • LIFETIME PROHIBITOR WELF & INST CODE § 8103 SUBD. (F)(1)(B) 18 U.S.C. § 922 (G) (4)
    • CA MHRS >
      • Armed and Prohibited Person System
    • National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS)
    • Registration
  • For LPS Conservatees
    • RIGHT TO APPEAR IN COURT
    • JUDICIAL REVIEW >
      • WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    • NOTICE
    • MEDICATION
    • PLAN OF CARE IF DISCHARGED
    • RIGHT TO COUNSEL
  • BUILDING A STRONG CASE FOR CONSERVATORSHIP
    • POWERS OF CONSERVATOR >
      • Placement Powers
      • Medication powers
    • WHY ONLY THE PUBLIC CONSERVATOR IS ALLOWED TO FILE FOR LPS CONSERVATORSHIP
    • SERVING AS CONSERVATOR
    • DSM V DIAGNOSIS LIMITS
    • CONSERVATEE INTERVIEW
    • HISTORY OF DECOMPENSATION AND LACK OF INSIGHT
    • WRAPPING IT ALL TOGETHER AND CREATING THE NEXUS BETWEEN SYMPTOMS, HISTORY, COMPLIANCE, THIRD PARTY ASSISTANCE TO PROOF OF CURRENT GRAVE DISABILITY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
  • JUVENILE DEPENDENCY
    • FAST TRACK DEPENDENCY
    • DEPENDENCY APPEALS
    • DETENTION
    • JURISDICTION DISPOSITION (JURIS/DISPO)
    • §366.26 Hearing: Selection and Implementation
    • 730 Evaluators
    • Case Plan
  • New Updates
    • Right to Choose