PUBLICLY CONSERVED
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIPS FOR THE GRAVELY DISABLED
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIP OVERVIEW
    • POWERS OF CONSERVATOR >
      • Placement Powers
      • Medication powers
      • Suspension of Drivers License
  • YOUR DAY IN COURT
    • Deposition Sample
    • Conservatorship Legal Documents
    • Conservatorship proceedings >
      • Grave Disability
      • Venue
      • Conservator's Bond
      • When the Conservatee Goes AWOL
      • Involuntary Commitment
      • Conservatorship Factors
      • Riese Hearing >
        • Riese Hearing
      • Supplemental Security Income/ SSI >
        • Applying for SSI
        • Documents for SSI
        • Process and Appeal
        • Award Letter
        • Rep Payee
        • SSI Amounts 2018/2019
  • Public Conservator
    • CONSERVATORSHIP INVESTIGATION REPORT
    • CAREER >
      • Continuing Education
      • Public Conservator County Numbers '16
    • LPS Conservatorship for Dependent Parents and Minors
  • LPS Conservatorship Case Law
    • Peremptory Challenges and Conservatorship of Gordon
    • Conservatorship of Sorenson privacy rights and LPS matters
    • Imposition of special disabilities- Conservatorship of Walker
    • Continuing Jurisdiction/Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of McKeown
    • Hearsay and conservatorship of Manton
    • Conservatorship of the Person of S.A.
    • In re Ben C- Wende Brief no issue writ
    • Conservatorship of Roulet- burden of proof
    • Special disabilities and due process- Conservatorship of K.G and Donna H.
    • Conservatorship of Davis and Third party assistance
    • Marsden hearings/ due process Conservatorship of David
    • Conservatorship of Torres and admissibility
    • Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of Law
    • Conservatorship of George H- jury instruction
    • Public Conservator's Exclusive Power to Initiate LPS Conservatorship Kaplan v. Superior Court
    • Constitutionality of LPS conservatorship- Conservatorship of Delay
    • Investigation report- Conservatorship of Ivey
    • Conservatorship of Jesse G
    • Grave Disability Standard and Jury trial notice Conservatorship of Benvenuto
    • Conservatorship of Kennebrew vs Conservatorship of Karriker
    • Conservatorship of Hofferber- criminal incompetence and LPS
    • "Discretionary abuse" Conservatorship of G.H.
    • Conservatorship of Smith and strange behaviour
    • Jury Trials- ​Conservatorship of Jose B
    • Conservatorship of Baber and Double jeopardy and third party evidence >
      • WIP- Conservatorship of Tedesco
      • Conservatorship of Symington (1989)
      • Effective Counsel
      • Faretta and Marsden
      • Exceptions: Third Party Evidence
      • Present Grave Disability
      • Exclusionary Rule WIP
      • Fifth Amendment Rights
  • New Updates
  • Harm Reduction
    • Needle Exchange Programs
    • Safe Consumption Sites
    • Safer Injection Drug Use
    • Narcan
    • Syringe Services Programs in SoCal
  • CWS/CMS

cert hearings

4/17/2019

0 Comments

 
Having a hearing in front of a judicial officer vs a judge

During the first hearing for a 14 day hold the patient will first present their case in front of a judicial officer in what is known as a a cert review hearing. These hearings are not as formal as a writ of habeas corpus hearing which is heard in front of a judge. Many patients facing these hearings have no idea wha will happen or what they mean. As a patient it is important to know what will happen with the two hearings.


For the cert review hearing, you will present your case in front a judicial officer. The nurse, doctor, patient rights advocate will all be present. The hearing officer will place a recorder on the table to record the proceedings. The proceedings are considered informal but they are still documented and recorded. The hearing officer will make a note of the kind of proceedings will transpire and announce all of the parties present.. After all of the formalities are completed the doctor will be the first to present evidence. He or she may refer to the most recent hospitalization record, diagnosis, past history, and compliance. The nursing staff may propound additional evidence. that they have in notes. Then it is your turn to present what you believe to be your present condition. You can produce evidence that demonstrates medication compliance, evidence that shows you are not a danger to self/others or gravely disabled, and have a viable care plan. You can also cite evidence of taking care of your ADLs and proper care habits. All of these weigh toward making the officer see you as a capable patient who does not need to be involuntarily hospitalized. 

Be aware that these kinds of hearings are hard to win since the burden of proof is quite low being clear and convincing evidence. Usually you will have to present good cause for release which includes that you are not a danger to self or others, will be compliant with treatment in the future, have shelter and provisions should you be discharged that day, and potentially the diagnosis is incorrect. The latter is quite hard to disprove as the court will favour the doctor over patient testimony since the doctor is considered an expert witness. At the end the hearing officer will make a decision and place it into writing. This hearing is quite informal so don't expect too much pomp and circumstance. It may take around 10-15 minutes. I have only seen one person win a writ of habeas corpus hearing. Should the officer find that there is reasonable cause for detention, you will be held for the rest of the 14 day hold. 


For a writ of habeas corpus hearing there are more formal procedures set forth. To begin this will be the first time the patient will present their case in front of .an actual judge. The patient will receive paperwork with a hearing date. They will be assigned counsel to represent them unless they choose to represent themselves. On the day of their hearing it will be a bit similar to a cert review hearing. The judge will hear the doctor's testimony and then hear the patient's testimony through their counsel. Like the hearing officer the judge will enter a judgement be it continue the hold or grant the petition. Once the judge makes an order, it entered into the record and the patient will return to the hospital to continue their hold or be released. The mental health record shall be made confidential and sealed to the public. There is a minute order for the patient to view at a later date. 

Be aware that these hearings are informal and very difficult to win. However, it is also important that patients know what they face. Too often patients are told they have an upcoming hearing and nothing more. The patient then faces a judge or officer without knowing what they are looking for and struggle to present a coherent case.


0 Comments

Working with clients

4/8/2019

0 Comments

 
It is important as counsel or case worker to learn how to talk to mentally ill or what some would call"crazy" people. People who suffer from delusions, are manic, or overall mistrustful of speaking with social workers. Creating and maintaining that rapport with the clients will lead to discovery of valuable information and overall trust. With more trust between client and provider, the entire process is easier and faster.

To build rapport  the client must feel that they trust the social worker and that they have their best interests in mind. The social worker has to master the art of listening to the client's concerns and understanding the basis of what they say. Too often I hear clinicians say to their clients "thats crazy talk", "that doesn't make sense", or even "if you say that shit the public conservator will conserve you" [true conversation]. That doesn't seem too in line with supporting their client. The art of working with mental illness is to know how to couch saying "that is crazy" and rather drive the client to reveal to you through information only that what they perceive is a delusion.

As a investigator you should also strive to gain a clear understanding of the facts. If someone is talking about their body being stolen from them or believing people are out to get them, make an effort to find out "why" they believe that their body is being possessed. Learn the meat of their delusion. If they believe something, there must be facts behind why they believe it. Even if those facts are illogical, it at least lets you know what the person believes is the reason behind their beliefs and this is far better than a blanket statement without any facts. When probing for more, ask "When you wake up, what do you notice that makes you believe that people are stealing from your body. How much is missing? Do you feel them taking such from your body at night or do you wake up and find parts missing mysteriously?" All of these questions show the client that you care about their perspective and take an interest in how they view what happened. Rather than just immediately dismissing their claims as crazy or lies, the social worker shows the client that they have an open mind to believe the client. The client in turn may offer explanations that give light to why they believe such. It also gives the clinician a chance to explain to the court why the client's line of thought without portraying them as too crazy. With more facts in the court report, it will make the client seem a little less crazy as the client will have had a chance to explain them in a manner logical to them. In the rare case you may even find out that the client was not lying and through careful investigative questioning and work the client was telling the truth and the previous investigator had missed some facts.

0 Comments

cws data

4/6/2019

0 Comments

 
Child welfare services data      '16
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

caseworkers

4/2/2019

0 Comments

 
When I first meet with a parent, they are often at the lowest point in their lives. Most were trying hard to be good parents before they met us. The message our arrival sends is that they have failed. They are often angry, sad, lonely and disoriented.
During that first meeting, I worry about many things. What if I can’t connect to this parent? Are they going to cry? Can I make this any easier for them? Is it fair to expect them to take in all the information I am sharing during such a terrible time? What if they are angry?

Child welfare care workers have a very bad rap in the community as they are seen as people who steal children for profit and can snatch kids whenever. The truth is that most case workers out there are good and mean well for the families they serve. The families often see the case worker as an adversarial figure because they themselves are in such a vulnerable position where they may have just lost their children and are now in the early stages of their case. They may be resistant and believe that they do not need to change. 

When first meeting their case worker they may be rude and noncompliant. Many parents have cited that they believe that whatever they do they will still lose their children so why even try. The parents may refuse services or not meet with their case worker out of anger and resentment. And even though they may believe that their caseworker is against them, at the end of the day their rights may be terminated if they do not comply with services. As a provider you should also strive to be goal oriented. Remind the parents of why they need to do their services and that they are doing it for their children. Encourage and praise the parents if they do something right and keep them motivated with their services. If the parent falls of track, don't scold them or call them noncompliant. Rather, you should review with them what went wrong and how to best address it next time. What changes can be made. How can the agency help the parent with their struggles. 

It is the case worker's job to ensure that they provide the parents with assistance and have a good bedside manner. For you providers out there I know that it can be very hard working with some of the parents but patience and trying to understand their situation will go a long way. Make attainable goals using the SMART model. They will be far easier for the parent to complete. When goal planning also discuss with the parent to see if they have any conflict. They may have some trouble completing a goal but have a hard time telling you or feel too scared to let you know why they cannot complete the goal. Most importantly let the parent know that you are on their side and that you and them have the same goal of reuniting their family. The caseworker may have all of the power in the eyes of the law, but with power comes responsibility. The case worker should strive to share the power with the parent. Work with the parent not against. Work together as a team to return the child home safely and the amount of conflict will be greatly reduced.


I also know I wield power over my clients’ lives. To me, this is painful. My goal is to help families, but because the system has taken away their control, I often feel like I am doing the exact opposite. My ultimate goal is return power to them and bring humanity and respect into a relationship that is, unfortunately, lopsided.


The first way I try to do this is by being as respectful and supportive as I can no matter how parents are reacting. This can be done over something very small. It can happen through eye contact, through recognizing that you and the client have something in common, or by doing something as simple as thanking the client for coming in that day. -Rise



0 Comments

    Juvenile Dependency and
    LPS Conservatorship
     

    Informal entries about both subjects. Case law, updates in legislature, common sense information, and more....

    Past Entries

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018

    Questions or need more information?

Enter

Juvenile Dependency Court 
​
2851 Meadow Lark Drive  Dpt 10

San Diego, California 92123
Phone: (858) 634-1600


San Diego Central Courthouse
1100 Union St
San Diego, California 92101 
Phone: (619) 844-2700



Office of the Public Conservator
5560 Overland Ave Ste 130
San Diego, California 92123
Phone: (858) 694-3500 ext 2
© 2017 LPS Conserved   ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIPS FOR THE GRAVELY DISABLED
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIP OVERVIEW
    • POWERS OF CONSERVATOR >
      • Placement Powers
      • Medication powers
      • Suspension of Drivers License
  • YOUR DAY IN COURT
    • Deposition Sample
    • Conservatorship Legal Documents
    • Conservatorship proceedings >
      • Grave Disability
      • Venue
      • Conservator's Bond
      • When the Conservatee Goes AWOL
      • Involuntary Commitment
      • Conservatorship Factors
      • Riese Hearing >
        • Riese Hearing
      • Supplemental Security Income/ SSI >
        • Applying for SSI
        • Documents for SSI
        • Process and Appeal
        • Award Letter
        • Rep Payee
        • SSI Amounts 2018/2019
  • Public Conservator
    • CONSERVATORSHIP INVESTIGATION REPORT
    • CAREER >
      • Continuing Education
      • Public Conservator County Numbers '16
    • LPS Conservatorship for Dependent Parents and Minors
  • LPS Conservatorship Case Law
    • Peremptory Challenges and Conservatorship of Gordon
    • Conservatorship of Sorenson privacy rights and LPS matters
    • Imposition of special disabilities- Conservatorship of Walker
    • Continuing Jurisdiction/Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of McKeown
    • Hearsay and conservatorship of Manton
    • Conservatorship of the Person of S.A.
    • In re Ben C- Wende Brief no issue writ
    • Conservatorship of Roulet- burden of proof
    • Special disabilities and due process- Conservatorship of K.G and Donna H.
    • Conservatorship of Davis and Third party assistance
    • Marsden hearings/ due process Conservatorship of David
    • Conservatorship of Torres and admissibility
    • Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of Law
    • Conservatorship of George H- jury instruction
    • Public Conservator's Exclusive Power to Initiate LPS Conservatorship Kaplan v. Superior Court
    • Constitutionality of LPS conservatorship- Conservatorship of Delay
    • Investigation report- Conservatorship of Ivey
    • Conservatorship of Jesse G
    • Grave Disability Standard and Jury trial notice Conservatorship of Benvenuto
    • Conservatorship of Kennebrew vs Conservatorship of Karriker
    • Conservatorship of Hofferber- criminal incompetence and LPS
    • "Discretionary abuse" Conservatorship of G.H.
    • Conservatorship of Smith and strange behaviour
    • Jury Trials- ​Conservatorship of Jose B
    • Conservatorship of Baber and Double jeopardy and third party evidence >
      • WIP- Conservatorship of Tedesco
      • Conservatorship of Symington (1989)
      • Effective Counsel
      • Faretta and Marsden
      • Exceptions: Third Party Evidence
      • Present Grave Disability
      • Exclusionary Rule WIP
      • Fifth Amendment Rights
  • New Updates
  • Harm Reduction
    • Needle Exchange Programs
    • Safe Consumption Sites
    • Safer Injection Drug Use
    • Narcan
    • Syringe Services Programs in SoCal
  • CWS/CMS