LPS MENTAL HEALTH CONSERVATORSHIP

Judicial Review
LPS CONSERVATORSHIP Rehearings

LPS CONSERVATORSHIP Writs 
lps conservatorship appeals 

(2nd and 4th district specific)

  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIPS FOR THE GRAVELY DISABLED
    • ABOUT YOURS TRULY
  • LPS Conservatorship Case Law
    • THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
    • Conservatorship of Isaac O- court report omission and jurisdiction
    • Disparate Treatment- Conservatorship of E.B
    • Conservatorship of KW- hearsay and jury instructions
    • Peremptory Challenges and Conservatorship of Gordon
    • Conservatorship of Sorenson privacy rights and LPS matters
    • Imposition of special disabilities- Conservatorship of Walker
    • Continuing Jurisdiction/Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of McKeown
    • Hearsay and conservatorship of Manton
    • Conservatorship of the Person of S.A.
    • Writ of Habeas Corpus burden of proof
    • Conservatorship of Roulet- burden of proof
    • Special disabilities and due process- Conservatorship of K.G and Donna H.
    • Conservatorship of Davis and Third party assistance
    • Marsden hearings/ due process Conservatorship of David
    • Conservatorship of Torres and admissibility
    • Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of Law
    • Conservatorship of George H- jury instruction
    • Public Conservator's Exclusive Power to Initiate LPS Conservatorship Kaplan v. Superior Court
    • Constitutionality of LPS conservatorship- Conservatorship of Delay
    • Investigation report- Conservatorship of Ivey
    • Conservatorship of Jesse G
    • Grave Disability Standard and Jury trial notice Conservatorship of Benvenuto
    • Conservatorship of Kennebrew vs Conservatorship of Karriker
    • Jury Trial Delays - Conservatorship of Joanne R.
    • Conservatorship of Hofferber- criminal incompetence and LPS
    • "Discretionary abuse" Conservatorship of G.H.
    • In re Elizabeth R- LPS Conserved Parent with a concurrent dependency case
    • Conservatorship of C.O. - Waiver of Jury Trial
    • Conservatorship of Smith and strange behaviour
    • Jury Trials- ​Conservatorship of Jose B
    • Conservatorship of Baber and Double jeopardy and third party evidence >
      • WIP- Conservatorship of Tedesco
      • Conservatorship of Symington (1989)
      • Effective Counsel
      • Faretta and Marsden
      • Exceptions: Third Party Evidence
      • Exclusionary Rule WIP
      • Fifth Amendment Rights
  • LPS Conservatorship Court Overview
    • Public Conservator >
      • Los Angeles Public Guardian
      • CONSERVATORSHIP INVESTIGATION REPORT
      • CAREER >
        • Continuing Education
        • Public Conservator County Numbers '16
        • San Diego Public Conservator '19
      • LPS Conservatorship for Dependent Parents and Minors
    • WHY ARE LPS CONSERVATORSHIP AND PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIPS DIFFERENT
    • Court of Appeals >
      • In re Ben C- Wende Brief no issue writ
    • Trial Court Transcript
    • Conservatorship Legal Documents
    • INITIAL INVOLUNTARY PROCEEDINGS >
      • Grave Disability >
        • Present Grave Disability
      • Venue
      • Conservator's Bond
      • When the Conservatee Goes AWOL
      • Involuntary Commitment
      • Conservatorship Factors
      • Riese Hearing >
        • Riese Hearing
      • Supplemental Security Income/ SSI >
        • Applying for SSI
        • Documents for SSI
        • Process and Appeal
        • Award Letter
        • Rep Payee
        • SSI Amounts 2018/2019
  • For LPS Conservatees
    • RIGHT TO APPEAR IN COURT
    • JUDICIAL REVIEW >
      • WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    • NOTICE
    • MEDICATION
    • PLAN OF CARE IF DISCHARGED
    • RIGHT TO COUNSEL
  • BUILDING A STRONG CASE FOR CONSERVATORSHIP
    • POWERS OF CONSERVATOR >
      • Placement Powers
      • Medication powers
    • WHY ONLY THE PUBLIC CONSERVATOR IS ALLOWED TO FILE FOR LPS CONSERVATORSHIP
    • SERVING AS CONSERVATOR
    • DSM V DIAGNOSIS LIMITS
    • CONSERVATEE INTERVIEW
    • HISTORY OF DECOMPENSATION AND LACK OF INSIGHT
    • WRAPPING IT ALL TOGETHER AND CREATING THE NEXUS BETWEEN SYMPTOMS, HISTORY, COMPLIANCE, THIRD PARTY ASSISTANCE TO PROOF OF CURRENT GRAVE DISABILITY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
  • MAKING SENSE OF THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PRESENTING YOUR EVIDENCE AT TRIAL
  • JUVENILE DEPENDENCY
    • FAST TRACK DEPENDENCY
    • DEPENDENCY APPEALS
    • DETENTION
    • JURISDICTION DISPOSITION (JURIS/DISPO)
    • §366.26 Hearing: Selection and Implementation
    • 730 Evaluators
    • Case Plan
  • New Updates
    • Right to Choose

when do i file a notice of appeal?
​
When do i file a notice of intent to file a writ?

When do I file a request for a rehearing?


Rehearings: Patients can petition the court for a rehearing on the issue of establishment of permanent conservatorship. They are given statutory right to request a rehearing once every six months codified by WIC § 5364. When conservatees request a rehearing the conservatee carries the burden of proof showing that they are do not meet the criteria for current grave disability. Conservatees do not have the right to a jury trial at the rehearing pursuant to Welf and I C § 5364. 

Writ of habeas corpus: Patients can during the 14 day, 30 day, and T-con periods ask their counsel to file a writ of habeas corpus. This is a special writ proceeding that is fundamentally a request for the court to release the person from an "illegal confinement". Conservatees and/OR patients need be aware that most writ petitions are not won.

*Special exceptions apply to LPS conservatorship proceedings including rehearings and initial permanent conservatorship hearings.
WRITS AFTER P-CON ESTABLISHMENT

Appeals: 
Patients can petition the court of appeal to review the decision of the lower trial court if they believe that the trial court made an error in establishing a conservatorship or if there was some other procedural defect. An appeal is not a "de novo" trial. It is simply a review of the trial court's record and anything dehors the record will not be reviewed by the appellate court. 



RehearingS

Conservatees are entitled to petition the court every 6 months for a rehearing as to his or her status as a conservatee. Conservatees if they decide to petition the court for a rehearing, carry the burden of proof of proving that by a preponderance of the evidence that they are no longer currently gravely disabled in re ​Baber v Superior Court (Hill) (1980) 113 CA3d 955. Different courts may use different legal terminology but generally the bench officer will be looking to determine if there have been changed circumstances. This is when that plan of care form will strongly bolster a patient's case. There is no right to a jury trial when it comes to petitioning for a rehearing.

Conservatees and/or patients may also be allowed to challenge the rights denied under Welf & I C §5357 (voting, driver's license, right to contract, and consent to general medical treatment) and/or the placement and medication powers given to the conservator. These hearing vary from county to county so consult with appointed counsel about how to raise this issue. 



WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

A conservatee may challenge his or her placement or conditions of confinement by a writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of Welf & I C §7250 and, under certain circumstances, under Pen C §1473. Judicial review of the writ must be in the county where the conservatorship was established or in the county in which the conservatee is placed. Welf & I C §5358.7. The Pen C §1473 writ is available, but to sustain such a writ, the party would have to allege that "unreasonable consequences [would] ensue because of the limitations of the [LPS] statutory review mechanisms." In re Gandolfo (1984) 36 C3d 889.

APPEAL PROCESS

 
Many conservatees have appointed counsel who knows little of the appellate process. The appellate process is different from that of juvenile dependency in which different issues will be considered for review. Generally appealable orders are challenged through an appeal and non appealable orders can only be challenged through writ petitions.

If a conservatee wishes to appeal a judgement, the appeal is started by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of the superior court. Time is crucial. Counsel must file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. This requirement is jurisdictional; should counsel fail to file on time, the appeal will be dismissed. Special exceptions may apply.
 
The appellate court receives that notice of appeal while the clerk/trial court puts together the record. The court of appeal processes assigns a case number which is used to identify the case when searching for it. The court of appeal will send an appeal packet to the appellate lawyers who will review the case. It takes a while to receive the trial court's documentation so the appellate attorneys will not be fully informed about the appeal until later. A panel attorney is the person who will do the initial review of the trial court record to determine if there are appealable issues. Conservatees are not granted a de novo review by the appellate judge. A panel attorney may review the record and if the appellate counsel finds no arguable issues, he or she should inform the court and file a no issue brief setting out applicable facts and law that serve as the basis for the court to dismiss the appeal. In re Conservatorship of Ben C..
 
The briefing stages take a long time. The appellant’s opening brief is due within a certain number of days. The public conservator's reply brief needs to be filed within 30 days. Appellant has a select number of days to file their response brief to the public conservator.
 
If the record is not complete then the reviewing panel attorney has to file a request to ask the trial court clerk to transmit the missing documentation. Appeals are reviews of the trial court record; no new evidence or documents dehors the record may be proffered. Very rarely extensions of time are granted but the court usually denies.
 
 
Oral arguments follow the briefing stage. Generally, parties must give notice if they wish to make an appearance and provide an oral argument. The case will be marked as submitted if a party wishes to make an appearance. If no one wishes to make an appearance, then they will send back notice of waiver of oral argument and the case will be marked as submitted. The panel attorney will make a decision based on the trial court record and current case law.
 
The court of appeal will issue an opinion within a certain number of days after receiving the case is “submitted”. The opinion will provide the appellate court’s reasoning and deference to particular statue and case law. There is a period of time for several potential actions to be taken. There can be a request for rehearing, writ of certiorari, and/or publication/depublication. If the parties choose not to act then the next step will happen.
 
 
The court will issue a remittitur which will send the case back to the trial court and the trial court must proceed in accordance with the new guidelines set forth by the appellate court’s opinion. 
 
 
Generally, it takes around a year for all of the above to happen. Appeals do not happen quickly nor are they a chance for the appellant to have a second try at their case. The court of appeals will only look at the issues proffered in the appellant’s opening brief on the merits. Conservatorships are generally not stayed as the appeal goes forward.
 


In general, the duty of competence requires that counsel understand appellate procedure and the substantive law pertaining to the case at hand. However, reality is not a lot of lawyers are going to know the appeal process and preserving the record.



Sample notice of appeal Forms

Picture
Picture
Picture
COURT OF APPEALS WEBSITES

CAP- LA
Ben C brief (no issue)
ADI/ SAN DIEGO APPEAL
notice of implementation of Ben C
SECOND DISTRICT
FOURTH DISTRICT

    Questions or need more information?

    Leave phone or email for contact/ check spam folder for response
Enter

Los Angeles Office of the Public Guardian 
510 S Vermont Ave, 14th Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90020 
Phone: LPS (213) 974-0527
(213) 974- 0407
Los Angeles Mental Health Court 
5925 Hollywood Blvd 
Los Angeles, California 90028 
Fax: (442) 247-3972


San Diego Central Courthouse
1100 Union St, Dept 1902
​LPS Hearings Tuesday/Thursday 9am
San Diego, California 92101 
Phone: (619) 844-2700



San Diego
Office of the Public Conservator

5560 Overland Ave Ste 130
San Diego, California 92123
Phone: (858) 694-3500 ext 2
© 2017 LPS Conserved   ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • LPS CONSERVATORSHIPS FOR THE GRAVELY DISABLED
    • ABOUT YOURS TRULY
  • LPS Conservatorship Case Law
    • THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
    • Conservatorship of Isaac O- court report omission and jurisdiction
    • Disparate Treatment- Conservatorship of E.B
    • Conservatorship of KW- hearsay and jury instructions
    • Peremptory Challenges and Conservatorship of Gordon
    • Conservatorship of Sorenson privacy rights and LPS matters
    • Imposition of special disabilities- Conservatorship of Walker
    • Continuing Jurisdiction/Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of McKeown
    • Hearsay and conservatorship of Manton
    • Conservatorship of the Person of S.A.
    • Writ of Habeas Corpus burden of proof
    • Conservatorship of Roulet- burden of proof
    • Special disabilities and due process- Conservatorship of K.G and Donna H.
    • Conservatorship of Davis and Third party assistance
    • Marsden hearings/ due process Conservatorship of David
    • Conservatorship of Torres and admissibility
    • Jury Instruction and Conservatorship of Law
    • Conservatorship of George H- jury instruction
    • Public Conservator's Exclusive Power to Initiate LPS Conservatorship Kaplan v. Superior Court
    • Constitutionality of LPS conservatorship- Conservatorship of Delay
    • Investigation report- Conservatorship of Ivey
    • Conservatorship of Jesse G
    • Grave Disability Standard and Jury trial notice Conservatorship of Benvenuto
    • Conservatorship of Kennebrew vs Conservatorship of Karriker
    • Jury Trial Delays - Conservatorship of Joanne R.
    • Conservatorship of Hofferber- criminal incompetence and LPS
    • "Discretionary abuse" Conservatorship of G.H.
    • In re Elizabeth R- LPS Conserved Parent with a concurrent dependency case
    • Conservatorship of C.O. - Waiver of Jury Trial
    • Conservatorship of Smith and strange behaviour
    • Jury Trials- ​Conservatorship of Jose B
    • Conservatorship of Baber and Double jeopardy and third party evidence >
      • WIP- Conservatorship of Tedesco
      • Conservatorship of Symington (1989)
      • Effective Counsel
      • Faretta and Marsden
      • Exceptions: Third Party Evidence
      • Exclusionary Rule WIP
      • Fifth Amendment Rights
  • LPS Conservatorship Court Overview
    • Public Conservator >
      • Los Angeles Public Guardian
      • CONSERVATORSHIP INVESTIGATION REPORT
      • CAREER >
        • Continuing Education
        • Public Conservator County Numbers '16
        • San Diego Public Conservator '19
      • LPS Conservatorship for Dependent Parents and Minors
    • WHY ARE LPS CONSERVATORSHIP AND PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIPS DIFFERENT
    • Court of Appeals >
      • In re Ben C- Wende Brief no issue writ
    • Trial Court Transcript
    • Conservatorship Legal Documents
    • INITIAL INVOLUNTARY PROCEEDINGS >
      • Grave Disability >
        • Present Grave Disability
      • Venue
      • Conservator's Bond
      • When the Conservatee Goes AWOL
      • Involuntary Commitment
      • Conservatorship Factors
      • Riese Hearing >
        • Riese Hearing
      • Supplemental Security Income/ SSI >
        • Applying for SSI
        • Documents for SSI
        • Process and Appeal
        • Award Letter
        • Rep Payee
        • SSI Amounts 2018/2019
  • For LPS Conservatees
    • RIGHT TO APPEAR IN COURT
    • JUDICIAL REVIEW >
      • WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    • NOTICE
    • MEDICATION
    • PLAN OF CARE IF DISCHARGED
    • RIGHT TO COUNSEL
  • BUILDING A STRONG CASE FOR CONSERVATORSHIP
    • POWERS OF CONSERVATOR >
      • Placement Powers
      • Medication powers
    • WHY ONLY THE PUBLIC CONSERVATOR IS ALLOWED TO FILE FOR LPS CONSERVATORSHIP
    • SERVING AS CONSERVATOR
    • DSM V DIAGNOSIS LIMITS
    • CONSERVATEE INTERVIEW
    • HISTORY OF DECOMPENSATION AND LACK OF INSIGHT
    • WRAPPING IT ALL TOGETHER AND CREATING THE NEXUS BETWEEN SYMPTOMS, HISTORY, COMPLIANCE, THIRD PARTY ASSISTANCE TO PROOF OF CURRENT GRAVE DISABILITY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
  • MAKING SENSE OF THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PRESENTING YOUR EVIDENCE AT TRIAL
  • JUVENILE DEPENDENCY
    • FAST TRACK DEPENDENCY
    • DEPENDENCY APPEALS
    • DETENTION
    • JURISDICTION DISPOSITION (JURIS/DISPO)
    • §366.26 Hearing: Selection and Implementation
    • 730 Evaluators
    • Case Plan
  • New Updates
    • Right to Choose